What Justice Means to Me

In social institutions, fairness is the very first virtue. On the opposite hand, truth would be con attitudered to be of systems of thought. In the gaffe of theories, certain revisions could be through with(p) if it is found to be untrue. Even if the surmise seems to sound elegantly, changes would be required on it. The same thing applies to laws and institutions. If these laws and institutions are untrue, they would be reformed, or worst, they would be abolished. Utilitarianism states that a good action is the superlative good for the greatest number of people (Mill, 1863).But all(prenominal) and every individual has the ability to complete based on fittingice that the offbeat of a whole society does not often overrule the wellbeing of its citizen. evaluator rejects the idea that an individual could lose his immunity for the benefit of the different individuals. In a society, justice must provide the comparison which the citizen or the people should buzz off. Their rights should be protect by justice and that inequalities are reduced, if not totally removed (Rawls, 1999). justness for me is fairness.It is a way to give the things that is imputable to a person or an individual who begets cheating(prenominal) treatment. Each and every individual should experience equality especially with regards to rights and liberty, comparable to that which is see by other people. In adjunct to this, if there is the presence of social and stinting inequalities, it should be reformed. The inequalities should be arranged in a manner as to be rationally anticipated to be to everyones advantage. Also, it should be fixed as to represent positions or offices open to everybody, and not yet to a specific individual or group of individuals.In a field of study stated by Claire Andre and Manuel Velasquez, an individual named Beatrice Norton who was fourteen years old transfer a craped in a cotton fiber mill just handle her mother. Few years after, she had st opped from works due to problems with regards to her health. Exposure to the cotton dust in the cotton mill had resulted to a disease called br have got lung. Brown lung push aside is a chronic disease, and if it gets out of hand, it could be fatal. The symptoms of brown lung are similar to bronchial asthma and emphysema. Due to this disease, she was not able to work anymore and provide money for herself and to her family.As much(prenominal), she asks for the governments help in giving justice to what she had experienced. More specifically, she necessityed to receive stability recompenses from the government. Another case talks about Mrs. Vinnie Ellisons hubby who as well worked in a cotton mill. Her husband had experienced difficulties in public discussion and her husbands health was in serious problem fulfilling his job due to this. Mrs. Ellisons husband was fired because of this. excursus from being jobless, Mrs. Ellisons husband had no premium, as such, they had diffi culty living (Andre and Velasquez, backlash 1990).In these ii incidents or cases, twain Beatrice Norton and Mrs. Vinnie Elison, only wanted what is due to them or to their loved one. They wanted to be tough equally or fairly as to what they had experienced. They had worked for the cotton mill for years and chastely speaking, the victims should be given compensations or fiscal help. In this way, their efforts, labor and loyalty to the participation could be rewarded. In a just society, they should not be treated indifferently and that justice should protect them as well, just like how it protects other laborers or workers experiencing other diseases.As a Criminal Justice master key, I would see to it that they would be given whats due to them. I would furnish to investigate and check if theres any fault, mistake, neglects or shortcomings done by either Beatrice Norton and Mrs. Vinnie Elison or the cotton mill. I could readily give help or assistance to the victims of the br own lung in receiving at least(prenominal) a small compensation to pay for their medications. The improvement of their health could withal be pushed through as deliberations and investigations go on.I would also help in granting pension to these victims if it is found that they had not connected any shortcomings as to endanger their own selves to the disease. In the case of the cotton mill, I could assist them in finding a suitable compensation or pension for the victims without incurring much loss to the mill. Their policies could also be revised in ready to adapt to these problems in the future. Certain gum elastic regulations disregard be pushed through the royal court for the cotton mill to create or improve existing health or safety regulations so that the well-being of the workers could be addressed.If the court finds that the victims did not follow such regulations then, they may not receive what they want fully since it is not due to them. Distributing wealthiness an d good things in life that is equally deserved by one could be thought through common signified be given based on moral desert. Justice is happiness consort to virtue. While it is recognized that this ideal do-nothing never be fully carried out, it is the entrance conception of distributive justice, at least as a prima facie.As a Criminal Justice professional that considers that justice is fairness, this conception is already eliminated or disregarded. Identifying the necessary criteria in this situation seems to be impossible. In addition to this, from the point of weigh of distributing according to virtue, moral desert and trustworthy expectations are neither eminent nor identifiable. Therefore, it can be a fact that individuals who take part in certain arrangements receive claims from one another because of the existing agreements which were made.In the case of the brown lung cancer, certain agreements could be arranged in order to cum up with a fair end that would not pu sh one side to the losing end. By creating an agreement between the two conflicting identities, they could receive claims and equality or fairness can be served. Furthermore, the principles of justice as fairness that maintains a entire structure do not interest to moral desert. Through justice as fairness, there would be no predisposition of share distribution that would keep up a correspondence with it.