Introduction to the Bible

The marrow within the Message David R. convert Introduction to the watchword RELS311, Section B001 Win 13 Mark D. Wessner February 10, 2013 The Message within the Message up to now though salwaysal(prenominal) whitethorn tell that at that place is nonhing to a greater extent to a narrative than what mavin may see and read on the pages before them, I believe that some stories be more than businesseous historical narratives. For example, in the story of David and ogre I believe that the example David sets by his organized religion and trust in divinity to have got two him and Israel the advantage against this ominous foe as well as Davids words of wisdom to combat the menacing taunts from giant star are more than meets the eye.In this paper, I intend to dissect this course from the parole by explaining where it is located, I will analyze the literary style and char proceedingeristics of this career, and I will give a detailed and thoughtful interpretation of this charge by using the abstract exegetical approach. The story of David and Goliath is set in the starting al-Quran of Samuel which is located amongst the reserve of shame and the second disc of Samuel in the senile Testament.This narrative encompasses the entire seventeenth chapter of this book and is do up of fifty-eight verses. The first book of Samuel is one of thirty-nine books that make up the canon of the obsolescent Testament, interpreted from the Greek word kanon which means a ruleor a precedent for measurement, and is part of the Christian authoritative list of the books belonging to the Old Testament or New Testament (Comfort, 2003, p. 51). In this caseful, it is part of the Old Testament canon.This narrative is just one of military many that make up everywhere 40 percent of the Old Testament which constitutes three-quarters of the bulk of the parole ( tilt, 2003, p. 89). Besides the writings of Moses, a major prophet and author of the first five books of the Bible, also known as the Pentateuch, it is believed that later Moses and the systema skeletaleer(a) prophets and prophetesses during his animation the great outbursts of prophetic activity began with Samuel and the arliest kind of writing in which they bet to harbor engaged extensively was history, which afterwards became the basis of the books of Chronicles and probably of Samuel and Kings too, which have so much material in common with Chronicles. (Comfort, 2003, p. 53) Addition completelyy, it is noteworthy to shew out that in Jewish tradition Samuel, Kings, the Minor Prophets, Ezra-Nehemiah, and Chronicles are each reckoned as a single book (Comfort, 2003, p. 57).The narrative begins with the assembly of two armies the Philistines in Ephes-dammim and Israel on the separate side of the vale of Elah, which was among them, both on mountains separated by this v on the whole(a)ey (1 Samuel 171-3). Ephes-dammim, which is called Pas-dammin in the first book of Chronicles (1 C hronicles 1113), meaning boundary of blood which is believed to possibly have find from the sound red color of the newly p depresseded earth in this location and may have given origin to the idea of blood, scarcely the location is not absolutely certain (Masterman, n. . ). The Valley of Elah, on the other hand, is located just north of where the Philistine armies are believed to have self-collected with, which most likely was, the dry creek bed of the Wadi es-Sant dividing them from Sauls armies in the Judean mountains, though a more accurate description would be hills (Wilson, n. d. ). The valley between them is a triangle-shaped flat valley, located on the westerlyern edge of the Judean low hills or Shepelah only in the rainy season does water flow in the creek bed rom the hills to the east to the Mediterranean on the west (Wilson, n. d. ). This narrative ends with the devastating loss of the Philistines champion, Goliath, followed by the massacre of the Philistine armies, a nd the victory of Gods chosen nation, the Israelites. This narrative, like all narratives, is a story which retells us a historical event which was written by the inspiration of the Holy olfactory property and is intended to give meaning and direction for a given people in the present (Fee, 2003, p. 0). Fee points out that the major difference between a scriptural narrative and other narratives is that the story they tell is not so much our story as it is Gods storyand it becomes ours as He writes us into it (2003, p. 90). But like all narratives it has three main characteristics characters, temporary hookup, and plot declaration (Fee, 2003, p. 90). The characters consist of protagonists (e. g. God), antagonists (e. g. Goliath), and agonists (e. g. David) (Fee, 2003, p. 90).The conflict in this plot would be the imminent conflict between the Philistines and Israelites as well as the daily challenge given to the Israelites by Goliath which subsequently leads to fear and inaction by Sauls armies. The plot resolution, or denouement, would be the devastating defeat of Goliath at the custody of David which reverses roles between the Philistines and Israelites, in chill outs fear into the hearts of the Philistine armies, and completely overturns the expected resultant of this battle.In the Bible most narratives are also historical and/or biographic accounts and include accounts in the following books of the Bible Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1-2 Samuel, 1-2 Kings, 1-2 Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Jonah, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, Daniel, Haggai, Matthew, Mark, Luke, joke, and Acts (Literary genres , n. d. ). Though there are many narratives in these books it does not mean that each book is strictly narratives or any other genre for that matter.One thing that puzzle me was when Fee appears to contradict himself when first he states that narratives are intended to give meaning and direction, still later states that Old Testament narratives are not allegories or stories with hidden meanings, are not intended to give instruction moral lessons, and do not necessarily teach directly (2003, pp. 90,92). So which is it? This leads into the characteristics of Hebrew narratives the storyteller, the scene(s), the characters, colloquy, plot, features of body structure and a final word (Fee, 2003, pp. 3-99). For this pass the narrator is Samuel, I believe, entirely cannot be certain because later in this book his death is recorded (1 Samuel 251). The scene is set around the Valley of Elah. The characters in the order they are mentioned are Goliath, King Saul, Jesse, Eliab, Abinadab, Shammah, David, and Abner. The primary discourse is between David and Goliath but there is also a dialogue between David and Jesse, David and his brothers, David and King Saul, and King Saul with Abner.The plot starts off with the gathering of armies for battle which leads into the conflict presented by Goliaths cha llenge to the Israelite armies, the acceptance of this challenge by David, the slaying of Goliath by David, and the defeat of the Philistine armies. The feature of structure in this particular narrative is the repetition of the power and authority of God. This narrative, in my opinion, connects the dots from Davids anointing to be the next great power of Israel to his establishment of his kingdom.Then, to even come along define a narrative one can separate biblical narratives into three different levels which creates a hierarchy of narratives (Fee, 2003, p. 91). The top, or third level, is often called the metanarrative and has to do with the whole universal plan of God worked out through His establishment, e. g. the creation and the fall of humanity (Fee, 2003, p. 91). The next, or second level, is the story of Gods redeem a people for His name, e. g. he first and second powder compact (Fee, 2003, p. 91). Finally, the last and first level is comprised of all the hundreds of ind ividual narratives that make up the other two levels, e. g. the individual narratives of the patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, or Joseph) (Fee, 2003, p. 91). This covers the basics of a narrative, but to fully understand a narrative or passage the proofreader must form an exegesis approach to carefully and systematically study the Scriptures to feel the original intended meaning (Fee, 2003, p. 3). The most important part of exegesis is versed what questions to ask while reading to determine the context, whether historical or literary, and the guinea pig (Fee, 2003, pp. 24-28). After taking an exegesis approach the reader must then take a hermeneutics approach which can include exegesis but in this case is referring to seeking the contemporary relevance of ancient texts (Fee, 2003, p. 29). Fee, however, says that this approach is much more difficult to define than the exegesis approach (2003, pp. 29-31).For either, you do not have to be an expert but you must understand the mea ning of a passage in reference to the meaning of the sentences or passages before and after it (Fee, 2003, p. 27). Fee points out that the most important contextual question you will ever ask, and it must be asked over and over of each sentence and every paragraph while reading is, Whats the point? (2003, p. 27). We must, however, understand that this question will diversify from genre to genre, but it is always the crucial question emphasis added (Fee, 2003, p. 7). Interestingly, according to Fee, Bible translations like the King James Version and the New American touchstone both are generally written in paragraph form which can interfere with the exegesis approach because it can obscure the authors own logic (2003, p. 28). It does not mean it is impossible but should by all odds be accounted for when studying exegetically. For my exegetical approach towards better understanding this passage I turned to the help of commentary from theologians like Matthew Henry and John Gill a s well as a few other websites.According to the commentary of Matthew Henry, the Philistines were setup in Israels territory, not their own, and this could have been due to the noesis of Gods departing from Saul as king, the end of Samuel and Sauls relationship, and/or Sauls inability to be the king his people needed him to be (Henry, n. d). According to Josephus, in John Gills exhibition of the Bible, this all occurred because the Philistines sensed weakness in Israel and saw their chance to upgrade expand their own territory not to mention the opportunity for retribution for previous defeats at the hands of Israel (Gill, n. d. . I would have to agree with both suggestions as possible answers to the question, What is the point? , of this narrative. I believe, no clear upheless, that the main point is that David was just a shepherd, but by Gods strength he was able to exile Israel out of the hands of the Philistines just as he had done in the past delivering sheep from his floc k from a lion and a bear (1 Samuel 1734-37). Davids words are inspirational Thou comest to me with a sword, and with a transfix, and with a shield but I come to thee in the name of the captain of hosts, the God of the armies of Israel, whom thou hast defied.This day will the lord deliver thee into mine hand and I will smite thee, and take thine head from thee and I will give the carcases of the host of the Philistines this day unto the fowls of the air, and to the wild beasts of the earth that all the earth may know that there is a God in Israel. And all this assembly shall know that the Lord saveth not with sword and spear for the battle is the Lords, and he will give you into our hands. (1 Samuel 1745-47)In this passage, when David proclaims the name, or shem, of the Lord he invokes something like our power of attorney, where one person can act with the legal authority of another therefore it really means to come with Yahwehs presence, power, authority, and divine conflict (Wi lson, n. d. ). Just as Christians pray in Jesuss name David was claiming the victory over Goliath and the Philistines in the name of the Lord. David sets a great example of faith and obedience throughout this passage by trusting in God and by defending Gods reputation and glory.More importantly, he points out that the battle is still ultimately the Lords (Wilson, n. d. ). This is not the only example of the faith of David, a man after Gods own heart, or others similar to him in faith. Several examples of this analogous principle is reiterated time after time throughout scripture, e. g. 1 Samuel 146b 2 Chronicles 2015, 328 Psalm 3316-18, 20, 446-8 Proverbs 2130-31 Hosea 17 Zechariah 46 Romans 831, 37 and 1 John 44 (Wilson, n. d. ).In conclusion, the majority of the Bible is made up of many narratives which are both historical and biographical that by Gods infinite wisdom serve a purpose for us all today. There are those that would say that you should not read too deep into these nar ratives because what you read is what you get. There are others that distort these narratives to make them mean what they indispensableness them to for their own ulterior motives. I, on the other hand, fall in between these two very different schools of thought.I believe that ultimately there is a message within the message that God wants us to understand, but without the right questions you will never get the right answers. I hope after reading this research paper that I have achieved my goals to dissect this passage from the Bible by explaining where it is located, to analyze the literary style and characteristics of this passage, and to give a detailed and thoughtful interpretation of this passage by using the appropriate exegetical approach.In closing, I would like to quote a very true, but enlightening just the same, statement that I came across while researching Even though we rely on the Spirit, we are not so monstrous as to make no preparation. As St. Augustine once said, Pray as though everything depended on God. Work as though everything depended on you. organized religion and preparation are not mutually exclusive. (Wilson, n. d. ). References Comfort, P. W. (2003). The origin of the Bible. Carol Stream, IL Tyndale House Publishers. Fee, G. D. , Stuart, D. K. (2003).The Old Testament Narratives Their Proper Use. How to read the Bible for all its worth (3rd ed. , pp. 89-106). Grand Rapids, MI Zondervan. Gill, J. (n. d. ). John Gills exposition of the entire Bible. Freegrace. net. Retrieved February 8, 2013, from http//www. freegrace. net/Gill/1_Samuel/1_Samuel_17. htm Henry, M. (n. d. ). Matthew Henry commentary on the whole Bible. Freegrace. net. Retrieved February 8, 2013, from http//www. freegrace. net/ program library/mhc/1 _samuel/ 17. html Literary genres composing information with style (n. . ). Helpmewithbiblestudy. org. Retrieved February 9, 2013, from http//helpmewithbiblestudy. org/5Bible/HermComposingInformationWithStyle. aspx Masterm an, E. W. G. (n. d. ). Ephes-dammim. BibleAtlas. org. Retrieved February 8, 2013, from http//bibleatlas. org/ephes-dammim. htm The Scofield instruction Bible. (1945). New York Oxford University Press. Wilson, R. F. (n. d. ). David and Goliath Bold Faith. The JesusWalk Bible Study Series. Retrieved February 8, 2013, from http//www. jesuswalk. com/david/02_david_goliath. htm